Tonight’s medicine induced post is brought to you by Nyquil and Excedrin migraine.
I just got home from a grad school weekend at Bowling Green. These are exhausting weekends that often leave me wondering if I can hack this for 18 months. Can I hack the schedule – flying to Toledo once a month? Can I hack the workload when I really want to do well at work and keep trying to run and have a tiny bit of a life? Can I hack being smart enough for this program? Self directed learning is new and it’s up to me to interpret so much more of the text reading than I was expecting.
I started my 2nd class, Organizational Behavior. I’ll save you my thoughts on the professor for this class and what I thought was one of my best responses to a question ever, and I’ll get to the multiple self assessments I took this past weekend. Argh. I just don’t know myself at all. Let’s review:
My most recent Disc Profile classified me as a high I, high D. This means I’m influential, prioritize taking action, disinterested in organization and fearful of being ignored. I put a lot of faith in Disc profile as team builder. I don’t think the big takeaway in Disc is knowing about yourself, but knowing how you can be perceived by others and knowing what colleagues may need to work with you most successfully. The goal is not to change yourself when you work with different types, but to adapt your behavior and approach. What’s most interesting about the Disc profile is that if you ask me, I’m an S. Steady, follows a plan, doesn’t love unplanned change.
Next up, the Philosophical Orientation Questionnaire, or POQ, (Boyatzis, 1992) plots my responses on a graph measuring my value orientation in Pragmatic, Intellectual and Human categories. (I just cited a source in my own blog. This is grad school’s effect on me.) I scored 70th percentile for Intellectual and, surprising to me at first but then making sense, 50th percentile in pragmatic. Only 30th percentile in Human. I hate people, apparently. Not really, here’s what this means, “With a dominant intellectual value orientation, a person will tend to determine the worthiness of an activity in terms of its conceptual contribution to understanding something. creating a cognitive map, or a framework describing what we know about something, is at the heart of this value orientation. There is a tendency to use abstract and symbolic variables to understand, describe, or explore a phenomena. The central issue underlying a dominant intellectual value orientation is an analytic concern.” Okay, I can perceive my ability to use abstract variables. I think. The rest of it sounds like mumbo jumbo. I do not think an intellectual would say mumbo jumbo. I do see my pragmatic side coming out more as I get older, wiser. ”…a person will tend to determine the worthiness of an activity in terms of its measurable utility toward desired ends, or objectives.” It’s true, if I don’t see the means getting me to the end, I dig my heels in some. I’m less about having fun lately, more about getting the results. Ok… moving on…
Meyers Briggs declares I am an ENTJ; “the leaders who take charge, provide structure and drive a group forward. They are impatient with things that don’t contribute to achieving the goal…” In line with my pragmatism and Disc profile, I’m getting a picture that I like to take charge. But I don’t actually want to be in charge. I’m just impatient. I like to facilitate moving forward, but I don’t want to be the boss. I know that much for sure. I’d actually much rather follow someone else’s really good plan, as long as I deem it a really good plan…
And I pause here to ponder, if I’m sooooo good at driving people towards goals, why can’t I drive myself there? Why do I freak out at 1/2 marathon training plans or finishing homework or any of the other things I feel I’ve bailed on? Do I need to better define my goals so I can push myself towards them?
Lastly, the FIRO-B. I had not heard of this one before. It measures both your output and your desire for Inclusion, Control and Affection/openness. If the POQ showed me I hate people, the FIRO-B showed me I’m going to die alone. It boils down to I want other people to feel included and I do a good job of ensuring people feel welcome. I don’t give a rat’s pitootie if I’m ever invited to the party. Seriously, my score was 0 on that one. I get that – I don’t draw my self confidence and esteem from being invited out as much as I may have in the past. I’m pretty secure in my alone-ness. Did that happen in Chicago? Post Chicago? Just comes from being self reliant? Eh, whatever it is, I’m buying that one. The next one says I both want to assume leadership and exert influence, at the same time I need others to assume followership roles and be open to my influence. This is the one I struggle with, just like the Disc Profile high D bit. The last one wigs me out. I think of myself as a person who craves affection. I want to be taken care of – not in a victim way – but in a supportive-I-can-relax-and-let-someone-in-while-I-lean-on-them way. I crave physical affection and have a huge desire for people to get me. Survey says: I express to others that I care about them (and only nominally), while what I need or want from others is distance and I’m disinterested in being on the receiving end of friendship. Yikes! And yet…
I don’t care that much about most people’s lives….
Except that I love to talk to strangers…
And I’ve hosted couch surfers….
And I keep up with 50 blogs written by complete strangers to me, yet I’d love to meet most of the bloggers I read…
But I am annoyed easily by dippy co-workers and irritating co-students…
I’m conflicted.
I think it’s time for me to embrace some of these assessments. I clearly have an influential leadership streak in me. Perhaps if i stopped suppressing it I could reach a fuller potential for myself? I used to be charming and likable, mostly I feel annoyed and jerky lately.
Maybe it’s because I live in a state of mostly exhausted.
Bedtime.











